|
It goes without saying that conservatives
and their Sean Hannity media megaphones hated Barack Obama with a passion,
and now realize that his administration facilitated and orchestrated a
smear attack on the GOP candidate for President.
For instance, the Daily Caller was all
over the case today with even more inflammatory detail from a former U.S.
Attorney and two White House National Security Council (NSC) veterans:
Former President Barack Obama’s national security adviser
Susan Rice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce “detailed spreadsheets” of
legal phone calls involving Donald Trump and his aides when he was running
for president, according to former U.S. Attorney Joseph diGenova.
“What was produced by the intelligence community at the
request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls
with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with
individuals,” diGenova told The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative
Group Monday.
“The overheard conversations involved no illegal activity by
anybody of the Trump associates, or anyone they were speaking with,”
diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the
unmasking of the people in the calls.”
Col. (Ret.) James Waurishuk, an NSC veteran and former
deputy director for intelligence at the U.S. Central Command, told the
Daily Caller News Foundation’s (DCNF) that many hands had to be involved
throughout the Obama administration to launch such a political spying
program.
“We’re looking at a potential constitutional crisis from the
standpoint that we used an extremely strong capability that’s supposed to
be used to safeguard and protect the country,” he said. “And we used it for
political purposes by a sitting president. That takes on a new precedent.”
Michael Doran, former NSC senior director, told the DCNF
Monday that “somebody blew a hole in the wall between national security
secrets and partisan politics.” This “was a stream of information that was
supposed to be hermetically sealed from politics and the Obama
administration found a way to blow a hole in that wall,” he said.
“That’s a felony,” he told the DCNF. “And you can get 10
years for that. It is a tremendous abuse of the system. We’re not supposed
to be monitoring American citizens. Bigger than the crime, is the breach of
public trust.”
|
And now that
Obama's fingerprints are all over the Deep State's 2016 election
intrusions, there is an opening for junior GOP legislators to follow
Senator Paul's brilliant lead.
|
Senator Rand Paul pointed the finger at
Susan Rice. And now that Obama's fingerprints are all over the Deep State's
2016 election intrusions, there is an opening for junior GOP legislators to
follow Senator Paul's brilliant lead.
In pouncing on the Susan Rice smoking gun
Rand has managed to meld a partisan attack on Team Obama with a spirited
and cogent defense of constitutional liberties under the 4th Amendment; and
to expose the Deep State’s frightening potential for abuse of power.
At the moment, the pro-establishment
spinners and their boosters in the mainstream editorial pages are trying
desperately to distract from the case they can no longer deny.
That is to say, yes, Susan Rice -- and
probably CIA Director Brennan and others -- did "unmask" the
names of Trump associates. But it was all done, they maintain, in the
pursuit of their duties to acquire "foreign intelligence
information" and was in no way improper.
Likewise, they are loudly insisting that
the Deep State surveillance apparatus was just going about its ordinary
business of monitoring nasty foreigners when Trump associates -- or even
the Donald himself -- became an inadvertent victim of
"incidental" surveillance. So there is nothing sinister about
that, either.
It's not gonna wash.
There can be little doubt that the whole
Russian hacking narrative was invented by the Deep State, and then massaged
and leaked by top Obama officials including Rice, Brennan and numerous
others for one purpose alone that had nothing to do with national security.
That is, to prevent the election of an
impetuous, strong-willed anti-globalist that the establishment deeply
disapproved and then to re-litigate the election once the unthinkable
happened on November 8th.
So not only is the whole hacking story
essentially a glorified piece of opposition research peddled by the DNC and
its affiliates, whatever “forensic evidence” that may exist was undoubtedly
manufactured by the Deep State itself.
That's right. Owing to the latest
Wikileaks disclosures of March 2017 via a trove of leaked CIA documents it
calls "Vault 7," it now appears that all of the other dubious
intelligence community's claims and "assessments" about Russian
hacking have been ash-canned.
That is, Vault 7 suggests the CIA has the
ability to manufacture and deposit electronic trails to “misdirect
attribution” by leaving false cyber fingerprints.
Using a library of foreign malware and
hacking tools, the CIA can plant Russian, Chinese, Iranian or other
hackers’ fingerprints to make the hackers appear to be from one of those
countries -- even as they do the job from the comfort of their offices in
Langley, VA.
Needless to say, that explains how the
alleged Russian hackers could be so "clumsy" as to leave obvious
and damning fingerprints on their work.
So it is probable that the Russians were
"clumsy" because they weren't actually "Russians". They
were undoubtedly CIA operatives from the Center for Cyber Intelligence.
|
So it is
probable that the Russians were "clumsy" because they weren't
actually "Russians".
|
But every single dirty deed of this
illicit campaign will come out because the Deep State is not a monolith;
it's still populated with whistleblowers and operators with a score to
settle.
|
2 comments:
I've never trusted Obama-he's well known for his dirty tricks...just ask Hillary-ha ha!
In my half century of following politics I've never seen such a bunch of sore losers...the Dems have become traitorous in their actions.
Post a Comment