Poor Man Survival
Self Reliance tools for
independent minded people…
A Digest of Urban
It’s clear: Amerika is under
attack from within
While few want to admit it... what’s happening in our country right now points toward the possibility of a very bleak future... a future filled with bloodshed and chaos and darkness under Communist domination.
And as you know, we’ve provided people
just like you with information and tools to get prepared for
the worst-case scenarios we’re facing.
The U.S. as a nation has only been "invaded" a handful
of times in its nearly 250-year history. Most of these incidents occurred
during the Mexican border wars, and once during WWII when the Japanese tried to
gain a foothold in Alaska (a bloody incident rarely discussed by mainstream
historians). In our modern era, the notion of a massive invasion has persisted
even though strategically it would be nearly impossible for any overseas enemy
to implement. Most of the fears surrounding a Cold War attack on America were
unfounded, and as much as I love the movie Red Dawn, communists usually invade
countries from within, not from without.
The reasons for the difficulty of attacking the U.S. are rather
simple — America is geographically isolated by two oceans and our direct
neighbors are allies. When people get frantic about an invasion from a country
like China, they reveal that they do not understand basic military tactics.
China, as an example, has its own geographical weaknesses to deal
with, including the fact that multiple nations close to its borders are not its
allies. China would have to consolidate power over most of Southeast Asia and
perhaps Australia before they could turn their attention to the U.S. Beyond
that, China has a navy made up mostly of smaller vessels, not large ships
needed for an amphibious invasion across the Pacific.
China does have nuclear weapons, but its arsenal is dwarfed by
other nations including the U.S. Any attempt at a nuclear attack would mean
China would be wiped off the face of the Earth. Even with some kind of alliance
with Russia or a host of other nations, the result would still be the same.
This does not mean a foreign invasion of the U.S. is not possible,
but there are a very specific set of circumstances that would have to take
place, and sadly some of these circumstances have already been met. The
following is my theory on how a true military invasion of America could be
Economic and social breakdown
The very first condition that would have to be met before there
could be a foreign invasion of the U.S. is a full spectrum crash of our economy
as well as mass civil unrest. If our currency system is degraded to the point
that maintaining our military becomes difficult, then larger defensive
campaigns could not happen. Naval operations in particular are extremely
expensive, and keep in mind that soldiers work for pay
Hyperinflated dollars are not going to entice the average person
to join up and potentially risk their lives. And, if there is a societal
breakdown then most fighting men will want to stay home to protect their
families. An economic crash could make a wider defense of America's border
untenable. At the very least, our ability to project military power outside of
the U.S. would be degraded, leaving countries like China free to invade their
Another factor to consider is that the collapse of the U.S. could
be used as a perfect excuse for foreign invasion on the world stage. Let me
Balkanization of the U.S.
As I have outlined in many past articles, this is already
happening. The U.S. is swiftly dividing according to political and social
principles, and this division is being driven mostly by globalists and
leftists. This is not to say that balkanization was the original plan of the
globalists, at least not to the extent that is taking place today. I suspect
they intended for the covid pandemic and the rise of cultural Marxism to
overwhelm conservatives and drive us into fear and hiding. However,
conservatives have rallied and are now taking back our freedoms state by state.
An internal ideological war is now forming: The political left
believes in collectivism, control, censorship and cancel culture. They believe
in using fear and intimidation in order to get what they want. Conservatives and
most moderates just want to be free to live their lives and to speak their
minds when necessary. The two sides cannot live together within the same space.
Our differences are irreconcilable. We must separate or a shooting war will
erupt (one will probably erupt anyway).
As the economic crisis continues to expand in the U.S.,
balkanization will become the primary solution. States run by leftists are a
drag on the nation's finances as their debts grow far beyond
conservative-run states. The federal government under Biden will turn to
increased spending and taxation as a means to slow the collapse, but this will
only hasten the death of the dollar and fuel more price inflation. Red states
and conservative counties are going to have to break away at some point if they
want to survive the crash. They will have to establish their own separate
monetary and economic systems in order to insulate themselves from the effects
of the inevitable supply chain crash as well as hyperinflation. They will also
defy any attempts at enforcing unconstitutional vaccine passports.
The U.S. would basically become two different nations
ideologically and economically.
At this point, the federal government and the leftists will
attempt to use economic consequences to push red states back into the fold.
They will try to withhold federal funds and stimulus dollars to
conservative-run regions while showering loyal blue states with helicopter
money. When this does not work, they will try to use military force.
I believe a large portion of the military and National Guard will
not comply with this effort. Being that the U.S. military is majority
conservative, it is more likely that they will turn on the Biden Administration
and support the red states. Conservatives would easily stop leftist attacks and
a move to consolidate the country would be the next logical step. This is where
things get ugly.
With the U.S. in a state of civil war, globalists will proclaim
that a "multilateral intervention" is needed to stop the chaos. They
will also continue to claim that conservatives are "violent racist
nationalist fascist terrorists blah blah blah, etc., etc., and that the U.S.
and its nuclear arsenal cannot be allowed to fall into the hands of
"extremists." The U.N. will be called upon to step in as "peacekeepers."
Multinational "peacekeeping" force
Even with multiple nations allied to invade the U.S., and even
with the U.S. in economic disarray, the invasion would be incredibly complex
and the chances of failure would be high. The only way for U.N. forces to gain
a large foothold would be with the support of a neighboring country such as
Canada, as well as the support of blue states with large coastal ports like
California, Washington and New York. In other words, they would need blue
states to help them bring in troops and provide safe port for landings.
The peacekeeping mission would be the propaganda rationale that is
fed to the public as far as why the U.N. needs to be in the U.S. at all. They
will paint conservative freedom fighters as the biggest monsters since the
Third Reich, and paint leftists as innocent victims that are being surrounded
and destroyed. They will claim that the rest of the world "will be
next" if conservatives are allowed to take control of the nation and take
over the massive arsenal of U.S. nukes.
In secret, the U.N. will be offering U.S. resources and land as
payment to any nation that contributes military assets to the invasion. They
will focus in particular on nations like China that already have an innate
hatred of the American people and the concept of individual freedom, and that
have a desperate need to expand. Like the Hessian mercenaries used by the
British during the Revolutionary War, the U.N. will need troops with a
proclivity for brutality and little to no empathy or regard for Americans.
Reign of terror
Regular civilians and non-combatants would deal with the brunt of
the violence in places where the U.N. establishes a foothold. They may leave
blue states' residents alone as part of the agreement, or they may not. I would
not be surprised if the leftists who cheer on the U.N. end up being abused by
U.N. troops as thanks.
The U.N.'s focus would be on isolating freedom fighters from the
rest of the American population so that recruitment is difficult and blending
in becomes untenable. This would require that civilians be interned, perhaps
into larger cities with biometric surveillance. The message would be that the
despair of the public is the fault of the rebellion. They would tell people
that the pain will end when the rebellion is defeated; the goal will be to get
the public to turn on their ideals and to turn on freedom fighters.
As always, the first mission of any rebellion is to dispel lies
and propaganda. This requires that they are able to spread facts, evidence and
information freely. For now, this means discussing the above potential scenario
in the alternative media and warning people ahead of time how things might play
out if we do not remain vigilant. We need to ensure that people are made aware
of the globalists so that they do not welcome them with open arms as saviors
during a crisis.
But what if internet communications are restricted or shut down?
The best way to spread information during a domestic collapse and
conflict would be through Ham radio as well as old-school printing. Fliers
spread everywhere conveying the true intentions of the conservative insurgency
would be vital to the effort. Regular transmissions by HF ham would become the
new alternative media. There is very little that any government could do to
Unfortunately, balkanization might help the narrative case for
U.N. intervention within the U.S., but it is also a necessary step toward
preventing further loss of freedoms. It's a bit of a Catch-22. However,
balkanization will have to be treated as a temporary solution, because leftists
and the federal government will try
to dismantle red states that separate. And as soon as blue states declare that
they will support foreign intervention, conservatives would have to take away
their ability to render aid to the enemy. This means going on the offensive.
Any campaign to keep our freedoms in the U.S. would be arduous,
and the fight against an international force would take many years to win. I
often study the Finish 'Winter War' against the massive communist invasion in
1939 as a model for rebellion, except in the case of a U.S. insurgency I would
multiply the threat and the time needed to fight back by a factor of 10.
Winning would mean wearing the invaders down and disrupting their logistics —
we would have to make life so miserable for them and the cost of occupation so
high that they would be desperate to leave. Remove all incentives for invasion
and the invasion will eventually end.
To summarize, a foreign campaign against the U.S. would require
help from the inside (probably from blue state leftists). It would require an
economic crisis. It would require the resounding demonization of conservative
freedom fighters. It would require extremely brutal and ugly tactics well
outside the Geneva Conventions. And it would require a vast logistical supply
that would have to somehow be kept safe from attack. A U.N.-led invasion might
even seem at first to be successful, but over time it would fail as
conservatives hold out and continue to fight the long game.
The danger would be if the enemy is able to wear down the
rebellion, rather than the rebellion wearing down the enemy. Converting the
public to their side and establishing a perpetual supply chain for their forces
would be their biggest priorities. Their intent will be to take permanent hold
of U.S. territory and make people believe that their victory is imminent. If
the rebels can prove them wrong over and over again, then the public will be
less likely to take their side. But, if the enemy is able to achieve multiple
tangible victories without much resistance, then many average people will
simply jump to support them as a means of survival.
I'm sure this all sounds like an inconsequential theory, but look
at the world today; there have been events recently which very few people
thought possible only a couple of years ago. And things are not necessarily
going back to normal. It seems to me that the U.S. in particular is a top
target for the globalists, in that we are one of the few places left on the
planet where the Reset agenda has failed to take hold completely. If they
cannot find a way to force the Reset mandates in all U.S. states, then they
will inevitably turn to military options. It is only logical that
liberty-minded people prepare for this eventuality.
To truth and knowledge,
America is on a collision course with itself, and nothing can
stop what's coming in terms of catastrophic ramifications in the food supply,
currency collapse, economic collapse, social collapse and the collapse of the
rule of law (which is already well under way).
The America we once knew is never coming back. There will never
be a "return to normal." Only collapse, a thinning out of the herd,
and then on the other side, recovery and rebuilding among the survivors.
TEACHING THE MARXIST CRITICAL RACE THEORY FROM OUR SCHOOLS!
They are lying when they claim, "It's only basic diversity training."
Let's review some basic facts of CRT.
- All critical theories, including
CRT, are a neo-Marxist critique of capitalism and free society based on
- CRT advocates admit it's to
- CRT judges all social interactions
through a racial lens and in education it places racial guilt on kids by
separating them between oppressor and oppressed.
Critical race theory claims that one’s race
alone defines them and is their most important characteristic. Furthermore,
critical race theory seeks to divide children by race and attempts to make them
feel responsible and guilty of atrocities that they did not commit. So far,
seven states have taken action to ban the teaching of critical race theory:
Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Montana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas.
several states have banned teaching racial essentialism and collective guilt on
kids in education, you can help me empower parents by helping to teach kids
about individualism, free markets, and liberty…
Making your own meat powder is a great way to add shelf-stable
meat to your pantry. Meat powder can add a dash of protein to any meal and
easily dissolve into soups and stews when you are out of fresh meat.
What I love about making your own meat powder is that you can
make sure that you like all of the ingredients. There are no fillers or
ingredients that are hard to pronounce because you can mix and match items in
your kitchen that you and your family prefer.
While meat powder may not be the main part of your daily meals
in your home today, it could be quite beneficial in an emergency situation when
there is no meat supply. I also love that you can use those odd cuts of meat
from animals that are hard to use...
You may also like...
CREATING AN EMERGENCY
FOOD SUPPLY-FOOD SURVIVAL REPORTS-FREE
Compliments of: The
TRS volt power bank - Back in stock!
3000mAh Power Bank Battery by Volt comes complete with a
micro USB charging cord. This battery can be used as an extra or replacement
Free enterprise, limited
government, individual freedom!
and subscribers enable the Poor Man Survivor to post 150+ free essays annually. It is for this reason they are Heroes
and Heroines of New Media. Without your financial support, the free content
would disappear for the simple reason that I cannot keep body and soul together
on my meager book sales & ecommerce alone.
You Can’t Buy Life Insurance After You’re Dead
That's Bad News...
Buy Life Insurance After You’re Dead-Prepare NOW for Emergencies…Small radios,
books, emergency power cell or solar/battery
radio weather radio!
TACTICAL SHOTGUN FOR SELF-DEFENSE [DVD]
Takes you to the world famous Gunsite Training Center
efforts by shopping my storefront…
A Smoking Frog Feature, Shallow Planet Production